To reduce drawdown, you cut how far your portfolio falls from its peak, and you do it with rules set in advance rather than gut calls made during a selloff. The tools that hold up best are asset allocation, periodic rebalancing, trend-based exits, a Treasury sleeve, and sensible position sizing. Expensive insurance like put options usually isn't on that list. Below we cover what each tool does, what the research says, and how to combine them without giving up all your upside.
TL;DR
- Drawdown is the drop from a portfolio's peak to its trough. A 50% loss needs a 100% gain to recover, so limiting depth matters more than it looks.
- Research favors indirect, rules-based defenses (trend-following, Treasuries, diversification) over direct hedges like puts, which are costly and drag on returns.
- No single tool works in every market. Combining a few simple ones beats leaning on one.
- Retirees face an extra danger: big losses early in retirement, while withdrawals are happening.
- A fixed model portfolio with written buy and sell criteria lets you follow these rules without watching the market all day.
Table of Contents
- What drawdown measures, and why depth beats frequency
- Seven ways to reduce drawdown
- A worked example: what a defensive shift can do
- If you are withdrawing money, drawdown matters more
- Leveraged trading is a different problem
- What we think: rules beat reactions
- Putting it together: a checklist
- Following a model portfolio instead of building the rules yourself
- FAQ
- Sources
What drawdown measures, and why depth beats frequency
A drawdown is the decline from a portfolio's highest value to its subsequent low, before a new high is reached. Maximum drawdown is the worst such decline over a period. It is not a realized loss until you sell, but it is the number that tests whether you stay invested.
The math is unforgiving:
| Drop from peak | Gain needed to get back to even |
|---|---|
| 10% | 11.1% |
| 20% | 25% |
| 30% | 42.9% |
| 50% | 100% |
That asymmetry is why a strategy that loses a bit less in bad years can compound faster than one that wins big in good years and gives it back. For scale, the S&P 500 fell from its January 3, 2022 peak to its October 12, 2022 trough, a loss of 25.4% over 282 days. A portfolio that had held that decline to 15% would have needed far less to recover.
Seven ways to reduce drawdown
1. Set your allocation before the storm
The SEC and FINRA point individual investors to the basics: asset allocation and periodic rebalancing as the most reliable way to manage risk. Spreading money across assets that react differently to the same news means one bad quarter doesn't hit everything equally.
The practical step: decide, in writing, how much of your portfolio sits in growth stocks, income holdings and Treasuries or cash-like assets. Your number depends on your horizon and your tolerance for watching the account fall. A useful test: if the stock portion dropped 35% tomorrow, what would you do? If the honest answer is "sell," your stock allocation is too high.
2. Rebalance by rule, not by feeling
Rebalancing brings winners and losers back to target weights. It forces you to trim what has run up and add to what has fallen, and it keeps risk from creeping up as a bull market inflates your stock share. The risk is overdoing it: constant tinkering adds costs and often hurts results. We wrote up a threshold approach in our 5/25 rule for rebalancing without overtrading, which triggers action only when a position or asset class drifts far enough to matter.
3. Add a trend-following layer
Trend rules do something simple: they reduce exposure when prices are falling persistently and restore it when the trend recovers. A 2026 study in the Financial Analysts Journal analyzed 220 years of global data and found that defensive absolute return and trend-following strategies gave the most robust, complementary protection against drawdowns. In one example from that research, a portfolio with these overlays cut its worst three-month result to -19.09%, against -34.34% for the global equity benchmark.

A separate 2025 paper found that combining trend-following with tail-risk hedging overlays on a global equity portfolio improved performance, and that the two approaches complement each other.
Trend rules are not free. They can whipsaw in choppy, sideways markets, selling a dip that reverses within days. That is the price of protection against the long, grinding declines that do real damage.
4. Skip expensive insurance
Many investors assume put options are the obvious hedge. Research on US equity tail risk found that direct hedging is costly and reduces risk-adjusted returns, while indirect strategies that change the portfolio's own characteristics worked better. Premiums are a constant drip, and you pay them in the years the crash never comes.
For most self-directed investors, the lesson is to build protection into how the portfolio is constructed, not to bolt on derivatives you have to roll and price every month.
5. Hold a real defensive sleeve
Treasuries have historically been the ballast that shifts against stocks in many selloffs, though not all of them, so no one should treat that as a guarantee. CFA Institute research on equity-risk mitigation found that portfolios dynamically combining diverse hedges such as Treasuries and trend-following were more effective than relying on a single strategy.
The design question is whether the defensive sleeve is fixed or flexible. A fixed one is easy to follow. A flexible one, which grows when conditions deteriorate and shrinks when they improve, can cut losses further but needs clear rules so you don't improvise.
6. Be careful with volatility targeting
Volatility targeting scales exposure down when markets get choppy. It sounds like a sure drawdown fix, but the standard version can overshoot or undershoot its target and, depending on the market regime, raise maximum drawdown. The same research found that conditional versions, with adjustment rules that reduce turnover, improved Sharpe ratios and lowered tail risk. The takeaway is not to avoid the idea, but to test any rule across more than one kind of market before trusting it.
7. Size positions so no single mistake hurts
A portfolio of 40 stocks that all move together is not diversified, and a portfolio with one 25% holding is a bet. Position limits keep any one failure survivable. Equal-ish weights, with caps, are easier to hold through a bad stretch than concentrated ones. For a more mathematical treatment of how to allocate risk rather than dollars, see our piece on risk budgeting portfolios.
A worked example: what a defensive shift can do
Take a $500,000 portfolio that is 100% stocks and a second one that is 70% stocks and 30% Treasury ETFs. Suppose stocks fall 30% in a bear market and the Treasury sleeve is flat (a deliberately simple assumption, not a forecast).
- All-stock portfolio: $500,000 falls to $350,000, a 30% drawdown. Recovery needs a 42.9% gain.
- 70/30 portfolio: the stock half falls from $350,000 to $245,000. Add the $150,000 Treasury sleeve and the total is $395,000, a 21% drawdown. Recovery needs about 26.6%.
The difference, nine percentage points of drawdown, is the result of one allocation decision. Add a rule that moves capital into Treasuries as conditions weaken, and the second portfolio's real-world drawdown could be shallower still, though you give up some return in strong markets. That trade is the heart of the whole subject.
If you are withdrawing money, drawdown matters more
For retirees, the same decline hurts more because withdrawals lock in losses. Financial literature calls this sequence-of-returns risk: a run of large negative returns early in retirement can force a retiree to scale back plans permanently. The same source suggests monitoring the withdrawal strategy periodically rather than setting it and forgetting it, so you can cut withdrawals before the portfolio is derailed.
MIT Sloan's work on the topic frames it as the interaction of adverse markets and planned withdrawals, which is why the early years carry the most risk. In practice:
- Keep a cash buffer so you don't sell stocks into a trough. Our guide to sizing a retirement cash buffer walks through 3 to 24 months based on your income gap.
- Be flexible on the withdrawal rate. Our look at the evidence behind sustainable withdrawal rates explains why a rigid percentage is rarely optimal.
- Bucket money by when you need it. See our bucketed, tax-aware model portfolio for retirees.
A note on search results: much of what ranks for "drawdown strategy" is about decumulation, meaning the order in which retirees pull money from taxable, tax-deferred and Roth accounts. That is a real planning question, best settled with a fee-only fiduciary adviser or CPA who knows your tax situation. This article is about the other meaning: limiting the fall in portfolio value itself.
Leveraged trading is a different problem
If you trade leveraged products like retail forex, drawdowns work differently, because borrowed exposure can turn a small move into a large loss. The CFTC warns that forex is extremely volatile and losses can accrue rapidly, potentially wiping out your entire margin, and that there is no risk-free strategy. Only trade with money you can afford to lose.
For active traders who do use leverage, hard rules on position size and stop placement matter more than any forecast, and execution tools can help enforce them. One example is a list of risk management tools for cTrader users, which covers lot size, stop-loss and partial-close controls. None of that applies to a long-only, unleveraged stock portfolio, which is where the rest of this article lives.
What we think: rules beat reactions
We built StockPilot around a simple observation. Most drawdown damage doesn't come from the market falling. It comes from what investors do in response: selling near the bottom, freezing, or abandoning a plan the moment it gets uncomfortable.
So our approach is to take the decisions out of the heat of the moment. The model portfolio has 19 positions: six income-producing holdings and 13 AI-selected growth holdings. Position sizing, replacement decisions and risk criteria are defined before the market moves. When conditions turn unfavorable, the system can reduce growth exposure and shift capital toward Treasury ETFs. Alerts arrive after hours, only when the criteria call for a change, so there is no need to watch quotes during the day.
We don't promise that this prevents losses. No honest system can. What it does is give you a written process for a bad market, so the decision to cut risk is made by a rule you agreed to when you were calm. You keep custody of your account and place every trade yourself.
If you want to see how the pieces fit, our articles on a 19-position momentum portfolio built to survive crashes, a four-bucket recession-resistant plan and tactical asset allocation tilts go deeper.
— David Elliot
Putting it together: a checklist
- Write down your maximum tolerable drawdown, as a dollar figure, not a percentage.
- Set target weights for growth, income and defensive assets that keep a typical bear market under that figure.
- Define a rebalancing trigger (a threshold, not a calendar date).
- Choose a defensive rule, such as a trend signal, and write down what it does to your allocation.
- Cap single positions.
- If you withdraw money, hold a cash buffer and agree on how you will cut withdrawals in a downturn.
- Review once or twice a year, not every day.
Following a model portfolio instead of building the rules yourself
Writing and enforcing all of this takes time and discipline. StockPilot Premium costs $147 per month and gives you the 19-position model portfolio, after-hours buy and sell alerts, position sizing guidance and performance analytics, with the risk-management shift toward Treasury ETFs built into the process. You mirror the trades in your own brokerage account. See the details on the StockPilot Premium page, or read the regulatory disclaimer first. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal.
FAQ
What is the best way to reduce drawdown in a stock portfolio?
There is no single best method. Research points to combining simple tools: diversified allocation, rebalancing, trend-based exposure rules and a Treasury sleeve. Relying on one expensive hedge tends to be less effective than a mix.
Do put options reduce drawdown?
They can, but the premiums are a steady cost. Studies of US equity tail-risk hedging found direct hedging reduces risk-adjusted returns, and indirect, rules-based approaches generally did better. Most long-term individual investors are better served by allocation and trend rules.
How much does a 20% drawdown cost me to recover?
A 20% decline requires a 25% gain to get back to even. At 30% you need about 42.9%, and at 50% you need 100%. This is why limiting losses can matter more than chasing extra gains.
Is drawdown the same as a loss?
Not until you sell. A drawdown is a decline from a peak and can recover. It becomes a permanent loss if you sell at the low, or if you are withdrawing money during the decline, which is the core of sequence-of-returns risk for retirees.
Sources
- Yardeni Research: S&P 500 bull and bear market tables
- SEC: Year-end investor bulletin
- CFA Institute: The Best Defensive Strategies (2026)
- Enhancing global equity returns with trend-following and tail risk hedging overlays
- CFA Institute: Working Your Tail Off, Active Strategies versus Direct Hedging
- CFA Institute: A Framework for Constructing Equity-Risk-Mitigation Portfolios
- CFA Institute: Conditional Volatility Targeting
- IESE: Sequence of Returns Risk
- MIT Sloan: Mitigating sequence of returns risk
- CFTC
